294 Mahendra Kumar Trivedi et al.: Evaluation of Plant Growth, Yield and Yield Attributes of Biofield Energy
Treated Mustard (Brassica Juncea) and Chick Pea (Cicer Arietinum) Seeds
chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll were consistently higher
in treated plants along with genetic variability using RAPD
DNA fingerprinting . The impact of biofield treatment on
the yield of ginseng, blueberry , and growth and yield of
lettuce and tomato were reported . Similar results were
observed in our experiment with biofield treated mustard and
chick pea. The results are well supported with the reported
literature in terms of growth and yield of crops. Based on
these results, it is expected that biofield energy treatment has
the scope to be an alternative approach to improve the plant
growth, yield, yield attributes, and development of crops.
Based on the study outcome, the biofield energy treated
mustard and chick pea
showed significant improvement of
overall yield of the treated crops as compared to the control.
The seed and stover yield of mustard in treated plots were
increased by 61.5% and 25.4%, respectively as compared to
the control. The percentage increase in yield was maximum
in case of mustard (500%) in the biofield treated seed as
compared to the control. Linear growth, plant height,
branches, and grain/seed yield of mustard and chick pea were
consistently increased in all the biofield treated crops,
without any precautionary measures such as pesticides,
fungicides, and organic additives. The harvest index of
treated mustard was increased by 21.83%, whereas the
harvest index was slightly increased in the treated chick pea
as compared to the control. The chick pea plants obtained
from the treated seeds and plot were increase by 97.41% as
compared the control plant. Additionally, the growth and
yield attributing characters, grain and straw yields of biofield
energy treated chick pea were increased by 365.1% and
353.3%, respectively as compared to the control. Overall, Mr.
Trivedi’s biofield energy treatment resulted in improved yield
in multiple kinds of crop, suggested the significant
application of biofield treatment in agriculture sector instead
of chemical measures to improve the overall productivity. In
conclusion, the present investigation demonstrates that Mr.
Trivedi’s unique biofield treatment could be utilized as an
alternate therapeutic approach concurrent with other existing
approach to improve the productivity of mustard and chick
pea in the field of agriculture in the near future.
NCCIH: National Center for Complementary and
Integrative Health; CAM: Complementary and Alternative
Financial assistance from Trivedi science, Trivedi
testimonials and Trivedi master wellness is gratefully
acknowledged. Authors thank Agricultural Research Farm of
the Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu
University, Varanasi, India for their support.
 Dubie J, Stancik A, Morra M, Nindo C (2013) Antioxidant
extraction from mustard (Brassica juncea) seed meal using
high-intensity ultrasound. J Food Sci 78: E542-E548.
 Tsuruo I, Yoshida M, Hata T (1967) Studies on the myrosinase
in mustard seed part I. The chromatographic behaviors of the
myrosinase and some of its characteristics. Agr Biol Chem 31:
 Bones AM, Rossiter JT (1996) The myrosinase-glucosinolate
system, its organization and biochemistry. Physiol Plant 97:
 Bassan P, Sharma S, Arora S, Vig AP (2013) Antioxidant and
in vitro anti-cancer activities of Brassica juncea (L.) Czern.
seeds and sprouts Int J Pharma Sci 3: 343-349.
 Amarowicz R, Wanasundara UN, Karamac M, Shahidi F
(1996) Antioxidant activity of ethanolic extract of mustard
seed. Nahrung 40: 261-263.
 Chemining wa GN, Vessey JK (2006) The abundance and
efficacy of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae in cultivated
soils of the eastern Canadian prairie. Soil Biol Biochem 38:
 Palta JA, Nandwal AS, Kumari S, Turner NC (2005) Foliar
nitrogen applications increase the seed yield and protein
content in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) subject to terminal
drought. Australian J Agric Res 56: 105-112.
 Barnes PM, Powell-Griner E, McFann K, Nahin RL (2004)
Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults:
United States, 2002. Adv Data 343: 1-19.
 Shinde V, Sances F, Patil S, Spence A (2012) Impact of
biofield treatment on growth and yield of lettuce and tomato.
Aust J Basic Appl Sci 6: 100-105.
 Sances F, Flora E, Patil S, Spence A, Shinde V (2013) Impact
of biofield treatment on ginseng and organic blueberry yield.
Agrivita J Agric Sci 35.
 Lenssen AW (2013) Biofield and fungicide seed treatment
influences on soybean productivity, seed quality and weed
community. Agricultural Journal 8: 138-143.
 Nayak G, Altekar N (2015) Effect of biofield treatment on
plant growth and adaptation. J Environ Health Sci 1: 1-9.
 Trivedi MK, Tallapragada RM, Branton A, Trivedi D, Nayak
G, et al. (2015) Characterization of physical, spectral and
thermal properties of biofield treated 1,2,4-Triazole. J Mol
Pharm Org Process Res 3: 128.
 Patil SA, Nayak GB, Barve SS, Tembe RP, Khan RR (2012)
Impact of biofield treatment on growth and anatomical
characteristics of Pogostemon cablin (Benth.). Biotechnology
 Turk MA, Tawaha AM (2002) Inhibitory effects of aqueous
extracts of barley on germination and growth of lentil. Pak J
Agron 1: 28-30.
 Shekhawat K, Rathore SS, Premi OP, Kandpal BK, Chauhan
JS (2012) Advances in agronomic management of Indian
mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. Cosson): An overview.
Int J Agron 2012: 14. Article ID 408284.